Contact Person

Dr. Elinor Switzer

Managing Editor

Phone: + 49 (0) 711 8931-230
Fax: + 49 (0) 711 8931-323
send an Email

Archive (2005–2015)

Mechanical testing of 3.5 mm locking and non-locking bone plates

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology (VCOT)
ISSN: 0932-0814
Issue: 2008: Issue 4 2008
Pages: 318-322

Mechanical testing of 3.5 mm locking and non-locking bone plates

M. DeTora 1, K. Kraus2
1 North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina, USA 2Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Orthopedic Surgery, Iowa, USA


Mechanical testing, LCP, LC-DCP, SOP


Locking plate technologies are being developed in order to provide the surgeon with advantages over previous bone plate systems (both locking and non-locking). Locking plate systems possess inherent biological advantages in fracture fixation by preserving the periosteal blood supply, serving as internal fixators. It is important to consider the strength of each orthopaedic implant as an important selection criterion while utilizing the reported advantages of locking plate systems to prevent catastrophic fracture failure. Mechanical testing of orthopaedic implants is a common method used to provide a surgeon with insight on mechanical capabilities, as well as to form a standardized method of plate comparison. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate and to quantify observed differences in the bending strength between the LCP (Limited Contact Plate), LC-DCP, 3.5 mm Broad LC-DCP (Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate), and SOP (String of Pearls) orthopaedic bone plates. The study design followed the ASTM standard test method for static bending properties of metallic bone plates, which is designed to measure mechanical properties of bone plates subjected to bending, the most common loading encountered in vivo. Single cycle four point bending was performed on each orthopaedic implant. The area moment of inertia, bending stiffness, bending strength, and bending structural stiffness were calculated for each implant. The results of this study demonstrated significant differences (p<0.001) in bending strength and stiffness between the four orthopaedic implants (3.5 Broad LC-DCP>SOP>LCP=LC-DCP). The 3.5 mm LCP should be expected to provide in vivo strength and stiffness similar to a comparable LC-DCP. The SOP should provide strength and stiffness that is greater than a comparable LC-DCP but less than a 3.5 mm Broad LC-DCP.

You may also be interested in...

A. Z. Aguila1 , J. M. Manos2 , A. S. Orlansky2 , R. J. Todhunter1 , E. J. Trotter 1 , M. C. H. van der Meulen2

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005 18 4: 220-226


J. Benamou (1), R. M. Demianiuk (1), S. Rutherford (2), C. Beckett (3), M. G. Ness (2), R. C. Haut (3), L. M. Déjardin (1)

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015 28 6: 433-440


R. J. Hurt (1), J. A. Syrcle (1), S. Elder (1), R. McLaughlin (1)

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014 27 3: 186-191